{"id":373,"date":"2015-10-14T21:31:06","date_gmt":"2015-10-14T19:31:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/zdravysex.sk\/?p=373"},"modified":"2020-10-07T22:30:14","modified_gmt":"2020-10-07T20:30:14","slug":"kapitola-11-rozvod-a-rozluka","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zdravysex.sk\/index.php\/2015\/10\/14\/kapitola-11-rozvod-a-rozluka\/","title":{"rendered":"Kapitola 11 – Rozvod a rozluka"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u201eNiektor\u00ed \u013eudia zosmie\u0161\u0148uj\u00fa alebo dokonca popieraj\u00fa my\u0161lienku vern\u00e9ho celo\u017eivotn\u00e9ho zv\u00e4zku. M\u00f4\u017eete si by\u0165 ist\u00ed, \u017ee nevedia, \u010do je to l\u00e1ska.\u201c (J\u00e1n Pavol II.)[1]<\/strong><\/i><\/p>\n

\"Ambro2\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Charakter \u013eud\u00ed sa najlep\u0161ie prejav\u00ed pr\u00e1ve v man\u017eelstve. Po prvotnom n\u00e1vale citov a entuziazmu sa a\u017e teraz partneri u\u010dia spolu \u017ei\u0165, u\u010dia sa te\u0161i\u0165 zo spolo\u010dn\u00fdch radost\u00ed, ale i prekon\u00e1va\u0165 ka\u017edodenn\u00e9 \u0165a\u017ekosti.<\/p>\n

\u017dia\u013e nie v\u0161etky man\u017eelstv\u00e1 dobre funguj\u00fa. Niekde vypl\u00e1vaj\u00fa na povrch rozli\u010dn\u00e9 z\u00e1vislosti, agresivita, celkov\u00e1 nezrelos\u0165 pre partnersk\u00fd vz\u0165ah. Ukazuje sa, \u017ee vstupu do tak\u00fdchto vz\u0165ahov predch\u00e1dzala neraz zna\u010dn\u00e1 nerozv\u00e1\u017enos\u0165. Najm\u00e4 nezrelos\u0165 a strata po\u010diato\u010dn\u00fdch sympati\u00ed bez ochoty zrieka\u0165 sa a obetova\u0165 sa z l\u00e1sky k druh\u00e9mu b\u00fdva d\u00f4vodom, pre\u010do aj kv\u00f4li men\u0161\u00edm nezhod\u00e1m alebo nedorozumeniam v spolo\u010dnom \u017eivote doch\u00e1dza k rozvodom.<\/p>\n

Napriek tomu praktizova\u0165 rozvody je spravidla absol\u00fatnym nezmyslom. Robia to dnes mnoh\u00ed, ale za cenu vlastn\u00e9ho sklamania a ne\u0161\u0165astia svojich det\u00ed.[2] V\u00fdchodiskom z \u0165a\u017ekost\u00ed v man\u017eelstve nem\u00e1 by\u0165 rozvod, ale pr\u00e1ca na vz\u0165ahu a na sebe. Existuj\u00fa na\u0161\u0165astie i man\u017eelstv\u00e1, ktor\u00e9 i ke\u010f sa ocitn\u00fa vo v\u00e1\u017enej\u0161ej kr\u00edze, pok\u00fa\u0161aj\u00fa sa udr\u017ea\u0165 a znovu spoji\u0165 rozbit\u00e9 vz\u0165ahy a nie un\u00e1hlene prehlasova\u0165, \u017ee rozvod je nevyhnutn\u00fd. To je aj d\u00f4vod pre\u010do neu\u013eah\u010dova\u0165 a nezni\u017eova\u0165 rozvodov\u00e9 konanie napr\u00edklad na \u00farove\u0148 podpisu jedn\u00e9ho tla\u010diva u not\u00e1ra. Mnoh\u00e9 p\u00e1ry sa \u013eah\u0161ie zmieria a zachr\u00e1nia svoje man\u017eelstvo v \u010dase, ke\u010f trv\u00e1 konanie dlh\u0161iu dobu. Po rozvode rap\u00eddne kles\u00e1 n\u00e1dej na san\u00e1ciu rodiny. Man\u017eelstvo by malo by\u0165 \u0161t\u00e1tom chr\u00e1nen\u00e9 a malo by ma\u0165 \u0161pecifick\u00e9 postavenie kv\u00f4li tomu, \u017ee zdrav\u00e9 man\u017eelstv\u00e1 s\u00fa z\u00e1kladom zdravej spolo\u010dnosti.
\nTrv\u00e1cnos\u0165 prv\u00e9ho man\u017eelstva je ve\u013emi d\u00f4le\u017eit\u00e1, preto\u017ee, ako ukazuj\u00fa viacer\u00e9 \u0161tatistiky, druh\u00e9 a tretie man\u017eelstvo m\u00e1 v\u00e4\u010d\u0161iu pravdepodobnos\u0165 rozvodu. Po rozvode je v\u00e4\u010d\u0161ia \u0161anca rozvodov v \u010fal\u0161\u00edch man\u017eelstv\u00e1ch, respekt\u00edve rozchodov s bud\u00facimi partnermi.[3]<\/p>\n

Sledovan\u00edm mno\u017estva konkr\u00e9tnych pr\u00edpadov \u013eudia do\u0161li k v\u0161eobecn\u00e9mu z\u00e1veru, \u017ee rozvody s\u00fa \u0161kodliv\u00e9. A to je ve\u013ea kr\u00e1t v\u0161etko, rie\u0161enie bu\u010f nepoznaj\u00fa, alebo \u010do je hor\u0161ie ani ho ve\u013emi neh\u013eadaj\u00fa. Neprekvapuje potom ani fakt, \u017ee zo sto man\u017eelstiev sa v posledn\u00fdch rokoch na Slovensku rozv\u00e1dza takmer polovica.[4]<\/p>\n

Rozvod zvy\u0161uje n\u00e1klady spolo\u010dnosti, utrpenie det\u00ed bez oh\u013eadu na vek a ni\u010d\u00ed aj nie\u010do v samotn\u00fdch man\u017eeloch. Preto by \u0161t\u00e1t nemal umo\u017e\u0148ova\u0165, aby rozvod man\u017eelstva bol jednoduch\u0161\u00ed ako zru\u0161enie nejakej firmy.<\/p>\n

Aby sme prijali padl\u00e9ho partnera, chce to bu\u010f schopnos\u0165 odpusti\u0165 alebo to chce z\u00fafalstvo spojen\u00e9 so snahou zabudn\u00fa\u0165 a potla\u010di\u0165 v\u0161etky chyby pr\u00edpadne \u013eahostajnos\u0165 a branie sexu ako hry. Niektor\u00ed veria, \u017ee vyrie\u0161enie rozli\u010dn\u00fdch probl\u00e9mov v man\u017eelstve sa d\u00e1 \u201erobi\u0165 cez poste\u013e\u201c. Je to v\u00e1\u017eny omyl. Pou\u017e\u00edvanie sexu na rie\u0161enie vzniknut\u00e9ho probl\u00e9mu v man\u017eelstve namiesto jeho vydiskutovania m\u00f4\u017ee vies\u0165 pr\u00e1ve k znechuteniu z tak\u00e9hoto sexu i cel\u00e9ho vz\u0165ahu.<\/p>\n

Rozvod a die\u0165a<\/strong><\/p>\n

Rozvod p\u00f4sob\u00ed neblaho hlavne na deti. Matka v rodine nedok\u00e1\u017ee \u00faplne nahradi\u0165 otca a plat\u00ed to i naopak. V takomto prostred\u00ed nie s\u00fa plne uspokojovan\u00e9 potreby die\u0165a\u0165a. Die\u0165a v ne\u00faplnej rodine je ochudobnen\u00e9 o mnoh\u00e9 podnety, ktor\u00e9 maj\u00fa v\u00fdznam pre jeho zdrav\u00fd v\u00fdvin. [5]<\/p>\n

\u013dudia, ktor\u00ed nie s\u00fa schopn\u00ed, respekt\u00edve nemaj\u00fa predpoklady (schopnos\u0165 sebaovl\u00e1dania, pevn\u00e9 z\u00e1sady a pod.) vytvori\u0165 a udr\u017ea\u0165 si zdrav\u00e9 rodinn\u00e9 vz\u0165ahy a hlavne man\u017eelsk\u00fd vz\u0165ah, tak\u00edto \u013eudia nie s\u00fa pre man\u017eelstvo v\u00f4bec sp\u00f4sobil\u00ed. S\u00fa to v\u00e4\u010d\u0161inou charakterovo naru\u0161en\u00ed \u013eudia.<\/p>\n

\"Stuart<\/a><\/p>\n

\u0160tatistiky r\u00f4znych \u0161t\u00fadi\u00ed dokazuj\u00fa, \u017ee u det\u00ed z ne\u00fapln\u00fdch rod\u00edn je zna\u010dne vy\u0161\u0161ie percento det\u00ed, ktor\u00e9 s\u00fa vy\u0161etrovan\u00e9 a lie\u010den\u00e9 kv\u00f4li r\u00f4znym psychiatrick\u00fdm poruch\u00e1m.[6]<\/p>\n

Deti naroden\u00e9 zosob\u00e1\u0161en\u00fdm rodi\u010dom maj\u00fa menej probl\u00e9mov, naproti tomu deti slobodn\u00fdch matiek s\u00fa vystaven\u00e9 ove\u013ea v\u00e4\u010d\u0161\u00edm rizik\u00e1m predstavuj\u00face nebezpe\u010denstvo pre dobro det\u00ed.[7]<\/p>\n

Deti v man\u017eelstv\u00e1ch biologick\u00fdch rodi\u010dov sa maj\u00fa lep\u0161ie ako v man\u017eelstv\u00e1ch nevlastn\u00fdch rodi\u010dov. V rodin\u00e1ch s nevlastn\u00fdm rodi\u010dom sa maj\u00fa deti dokonca hor\u0161ie ako v rodine jedn\u00e9ho biologick\u00e9ho rodi\u010da.[8]<\/p>\n

N\u00e1rast slobodn\u00e9ho rodi\u010dovstva prispieva v\u00fdznamne k schudobneniu rod\u00edn.[9] Man\u017eelstvo oproti tomu hr\u00e1 nez\u00e1visl\u00fa rolu v zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed pr\u00edjmu a zn\u00ed\u017een\u00ed chudoby.[10]<\/p>\n

Psychol\u00f3g Eduard Bakal\u00e1\u0159, vo svojej knihe \u201ePr\u016fvodce otcovstv\u00edm aneb bez otce se ned\u00e1 dob\u0159e \u017e\u00edt\u201c uv\u00e1dza \u00fadaje z nieko\u013ek\u00fdch najm\u00e4 americk\u00fdch \u0161t\u00fadi\u00ed poukazuj\u00facich na n\u00e1sledky rozvodov na deti. Orientuje sa pri tom hlavne na absenciu otcov v rodin\u00e1ch:<\/p>\n

\u0160tatistick\u00e9 \u00fadaje spracovan\u00e9 National Fatherhood Initiative poukazuj\u00fa na to, \u017ee 72% mladistv\u00fdch vrahov vyrastalo bez otca, 60% v\u0161etk\u00fdch p\u00e1chate\u013eov zn\u00e1silnenia bolo vychov\u00e1van\u00fdch v dom\u00e1cnosti bez otca, 72% v\u0161etk\u00fdch det\u00ed v detsk\u00fdch n\u00e1pravn\u00fdch zariadeniach vyrastalo len s jedn\u00fdm rodi\u010dom. U det\u00ed bez otca je v porovnan\u00ed s ich vrstovn\u00edkmi z tradi\u010dn\u00fdch rod\u00edn dvojn\u00e1sobn\u00e1 pravdepodobnos\u0165 pred\u010dasn\u00e9ho odchodu zo \u0161koly a celkovo dosahuj\u00fa hor\u0161ie \u0161kolsk\u00e9 v\u00fdsledky. Jeden\u00e1s\u0165 kr\u00e1t je u nich vy\u0161\u0161ia pravdepodobnos\u0165 prejavov n\u00e1siln\u00e9ho spr\u00e1vania. Tri zo \u0161tyroch samovr\u00e1\u017ed mladistv\u00fdch sa vyskytn\u00fa v rodin\u00e1ch s jedn\u00fdm rodi\u010dom. Deti \u017eij\u00face v ne\u00fapln\u00fdch rodin\u00e1ch vykazuj\u00fa dokonca i viac zdravotn\u00fdch probl\u00e9mov. 80% dospievaj\u00facich v psychiatrick\u00fdch zariadeniach vyrastalo bez otca. Ak \u017eij\u00fa diev\u010dat\u00e1 len s jedn\u00fdm rodi\u010dom, maj\u00fa o 164% vy\u0161\u0161iu pravdepodobnos\u0165 otehotnenia pred sob\u00e1\u0161om, o 53% vy\u0161\u0161iu pravdepodobnos\u0165 sob\u00e1\u0161a pred dosiahnut\u00edm plnoletosti a o 92% v\u00e4\u010d\u0161iu pravdepodobnos\u0165 rozvodu vlastn\u00e9ho man\u017eelstva. Nepr\u00edtomnos\u0165 biologick\u00e9ho otca v dom\u00e1cnosti zvy\u0161uje dc\u00e9rinu zranite\u013enos\u0165 vo\u010di zn\u00e1silneniu a zneu\u017eitiu o 900%. Tieto trestn\u00e9 \u010diny s\u00fa p\u00e1chan\u00e9 najm\u00e4 nov\u00fdmi partnermi matiek. Deti vyrastaj\u00face v ne\u00faplnej rodine s\u00fa vystaven\u00e9 v\u00e4\u010d\u0161iemu riziku \u010fal\u0161\u00edch probl\u00e9mov, medzi ktor\u00e9 patria z\u00e1vislos\u0165 na alkohole a drog\u00e1ch, promiskuita, vandalizmus a podobne. \u0160t\u00fadia \u0161t\u00e1tnych v\u00e4zn\u00edc v USA uk\u00e1zala, \u017ee len 41% v\u00e4znen\u00fdch vyrastalo s oboma rodi\u010dmi. Je to n\u00edzke \u010d\u00edslo, ak si uvedom\u00edme, \u017ee v\u00e4\u010d\u0161ina det\u00ed v USA v \u010dase \u0161t\u00fadie vyrastala s oboma rodi\u010dmi. \u0160tatistika FBI ukazuje, \u017ee ch\u00fdbaj\u00faci otec je spo\u013eahlivej\u0161\u00edm prediktorom trestnej \u010dinnosti, ne\u017e rasa, prostredie alebo chudoba. Psychol\u00f3g Warren Farrell tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee diev\u010da vychovan\u00e9 bez otca m\u00e1 nenaplnen\u00fa t\u00fa\u017ebu po akceptovan\u00ed mu\u017emi. M\u00f4\u017ee to vies\u0165 k n\u00e1padnej\u0161iemu signalizovaniu sexuality navonok, prehnanej snahe neznep\u00e1\u010di\u0165 sa a uspokoji\u0165 mu\u017ea. Rob\u00ed ju to zranite\u013enej\u0161ou vo\u010di mu\u017eom, ktor\u00ed sleduj\u00fa vo vz\u0165ahoch v prvom rade svoje ciele.[11]<\/p>\n

Pre veriacich<\/i>
\nRozluka a nulita man\u017eelstva<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201eJe ve\u013emi d\u00f4le\u017eit\u00e9 pred t\u00fdm, ne\u017e si dvaja s\u013e\u00fabia vernos\u0165 v man\u017eelstve, ujasni\u0165 si, \u017ee neprip\u00fa\u0161\u0165aj\u00fa mo\u017enos\u0165 rozvodu za \u017eiadnych okolnost\u00ed a bud\u00fa trpezlivo h\u013eada\u0165 sp\u00f4soby ako prekona\u0165 v\u0161etky prek\u00e1\u017eky, ktor\u00e9 \u017eivot ich man\u017eelstvu prinesie. V niektor\u00fdch pr\u00edpadoch, ak ide napr. o agresivitu v man\u017eelstve, je rie\u0161en\u00edm do\u010dasn\u00e1 separ\u00e1cia, ale nie nevyhnutne rozvod.\u201c[12]<\/p>\n

\"rozvod<\/p>\n

\u201eV pr\u00edpade zneu\u017e\u00edvania v man\u017eelstve Cirkev (…) prip\u00fa\u0161\u0165a potrebu oddelenia man\u017eelov a v pr\u00edpade nevyhnutnosti dokonca aj civiln\u00fd rozvod. To v\u0161ak st\u00e1le neukon\u010duje platn\u00e9 man\u017eelstvo. Man\u017eelstvo m\u00f4\u017ee ukon\u010di\u0165 iba smr\u0165\u201c, uv\u00e1dza Christopher West, ktor\u00fd sa vo svojich pr\u00e1cach venuje teologick\u00fdm a cirkevnopr\u00e1vnym z\u00e1le\u017eitostiam.[13] Ak d\u00f4jde \u010dasom k n\u00e1prave dan\u00e9ho stavu, ktor\u00fd viedol k rozluke, potom by mala nasledova\u0165 snaha o obnovenie spolo\u010dn\u00e9ho man\u017eelsk\u00e9ho \u017eivota.<\/p>\n

\u010co sa t\u00fdka nulity (vyhl\u00e1senie man\u017eelstva za neplatn\u00e9 zo strany Cirkvi), ve\u013ea pr\u00edpadov b\u00fdva na z\u00e1klade absencie formy. To zah\u0155\u0148a napr\u00edklad zna\u010dn\u00fd po\u010det katol\u00edkov, ktor\u00ed sa sob\u00e1\u0161ia mimo Katol\u00edckej cirkvi bez di\u0161penzu a ich man\u017eelstvo je od za\u010diatku neplatn\u00e9.[14] V in\u00fdch pr\u00edpadoch m\u00f4\u017ee by\u0165 d\u00f4vodom nulity man\u017eelstva zatajenie nejakej z\u00e1va\u017enej skuto\u010dnosti, napr\u00edklad ke\u010f bolo partnerovi pred sob\u00e1\u0161om zatajen\u00e9, \u017ee jeho man\u017eel\/man\u017eelka m\u00e1 die\u0165a s inou osobou.<\/p>\n

Ak bolo nejak\u00e9 man\u017eelstvo platn\u00e9, t\u00fdm, \u017ee sa niekto rozvedie a za\u010dne \u017ei\u0165 s in\u00fdm partnerom, dop\u00fa\u0161\u0165a sa cudzolo\u017estva, teda nevery vo\u010di svojej platnej man\u017eelke.[15]<\/p>\n

Ke\u010f sa zistia objekt\u00edvne d\u00f4vody, pre ktor\u00e9 je man\u017eelstvo od jeho za\u010diatku neplatn\u00e9 existuje mo\u017enos\u0165 rozluky.<\/p>\n

Popritom tie\u017e plat\u00ed, \u017ee \u201eak civiln\u00fd rozvod je jedin\u00fd mo\u017en\u00fd sp\u00f4sob, ako zaisti\u0165 ur\u010dit\u00e9 legit\u00edmne pr\u00e1va, ako je starostlivos\u0165 o deti alebo ochrana majetku, m\u00f4\u017ee sa tolerova\u0165 a nie je mor\u00e1lnym previnen\u00edm.\u201c[16]<\/p>\n

Presnej\u0161ie vysvetlenie celej tejto problematiky mo\u017eno n\u00e1js\u0165 v K\u00f3dexe kanonick\u00e9ho pr\u00e1va, ktor\u00fd je dostupn\u00fd aj na internete.<\/p>\n

S\u00edce existuj\u00fa v ur\u010dit\u00fdch pr\u00edpadoch relat\u00edvne objekt\u00edvne d\u00f4vody pre mo\u017enos\u0165 rozluky, respekt\u00edve rozvodu, ako pr\u00edklad nepoddaniu sa tak\u00e9muto rie\u0161eniu, by som odpor\u00fa\u010dal pozrie\u0165 si \u017eivotopis Sv\u00e4tej Moniky, matky Sv\u00e4t\u00e9ho August\u00edna. Jej oddanos\u0165 nebola slepou oddanos\u0165ou vych\u00e1dzaj\u00facou z ak\u00e9hosi jej vn\u00fatorn\u00e9ho z\u00fafalstva a strachu, ale pramenila z vernej, obetavej, nezi\u0161tnej a odp\u00fa\u0161\u0165aj\u00facej l\u00e1sky. Napriek r\u00f4znemu poni\u017eovaniu a zra\u0148ovaniu, ktor\u00e9 za\u017e\u00edvala po\u010das \u017eivota od svojho partnera, zostala jeho \u017eenou a\u017e do man\u017eelovej smrti. Pre v\u00e4\u010d\u0161inu \u013eud\u00ed dnes asi nepochopite\u013en\u00e9. Mo\u017eno preto, \u017ee to nebol \u010dlovek dne\u0161nej doby, \u010dlovek ega.<\/p>\n

Ve\u013ea spolo\u010dn\u00e9 m\u00e1 s t\u00fdmto postojom pr\u00e1ve kres\u0165ansk\u00e1 mor\u00e1lka. West k tejto t\u00e9me p\u00ed\u0161e nasledovn\u00e9: \u201eKe\u010f sa Je\u017ei\u0161ovi u\u010den\u00edci dozvedeli, \u010do si od nich nerozlu\u010dite\u013enos\u0165 man\u017eelstva vy\u017eaduje, mysleli si, \u017ee bude lep\u0161ie v\u00f4bec sa neo\u017eeni\u0165. Je\u017ei\u0161 im na to povedal: \u201eNie v\u0161etci pochopia toto slovo, iba t\u00ed, ktor\u00fdm je to dan\u00e9\u201c (Mt 19, 1 – 11) Komu je toto u\u010denie o nerozlu\u010dite\u013enosti man\u017eelstva dan\u00e9? Mu\u017eom a \u017een\u00e1m, ktor\u00ed ostali otrokmi svojej slabosti? Nie! Mu\u017eom a \u017een\u00e1m, ktor\u00ed skrze Ducha Sv\u00e4t\u00e9ho prijali moc milova\u0165, tak ako miluje Kristus! (…) Uzna\u0165 mo\u017enos\u0165 rozvodu znamen\u00e1 poveda\u0165, \u017ee Kristus n\u00e1s nem\u00f4\u017ee oslobodi\u0165 od hriechu.\u201c[17]<\/p>\n

Naj\u00fa\u010dinnej\u0161ie \u010do m\u00f4\u017eu dvaja \u013eudia urobi\u0165, pokia\u013e e\u0161te obaja maj\u00fa z\u00e1ujem na z\u00e1chrane man\u017eelstva, ktor\u00e9mu hroz\u00ed rozpad, je, \u017ee by sa mali za\u010da\u0165 spolu pravidelne modli\u0165, hovor\u00ed Matka Tereza.<\/p>\n

Odp\u00fa\u0161\u0165a\u0165, st\u00e1le odp\u00fa\u0161\u0165a\u0165, v tom je podstata l\u00e1sky, hovor\u00ed brat Roger z Taiz\u00e9[18]<\/p>\n

Pre t\u00fdch, ktor\u00ed sa chc\u00fa dozvedie\u0165 ako n\u00e1js\u0165 \u017eivotn\u00fa cestu po rozvode \u010di rozluke man\u017eelstva, vydalo vydavate\u013estvo Don Bosco bro\u017e\u00farku s n\u00e1zvom Rozveden\u00ed katol\u00edci, ale tie\u017e je v ponuke aj kniha s rovnak\u00fdm n\u00e1zvom<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"Trvanlivost<\/p>\n

————————————–<\/p>\n

[1] J\u00e1n Pavol II. L\u00e1ska v rodin\u00e1ch, Origins 16 (23. apr\u00edl 1987): 799. In: West, Ch. Radostn\u00e1 zves\u0165 o sexe a man\u017eelstve. Bratislava: Redemptoristi – Slovo medzi nami, 2007, 216 s., ISBN 978 – 80 – 969600 – 9 – 5, s. 42.<\/p>\n

[2] Bal\u00e1\u017e, R., \u0160tiavnick\u00fd, A. Milova\u0165 bez l\u00e1sky a sexu? Zvolen: JAS, 1997, 168 s., ISBN 80 – 88795 – 41 – 9, s. 120.<\/p>\n

[3] Matthew D. Bramlett and William D. Mosher, Cohabitation, Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage in the US, National Center for Health Statistics, Vital and Health Statistics, Series 23, no. 22 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, July 2002), Tables 21, 41, Ross M. Kreider, Number, Timing, and Duration of Marriages and Divorces: 2001, u.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports p70-97 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, Feb 2005), Table 3. In: \u010co \u0161kola neu\u010d\u00ed. [online]. [citovan\u00e9: 27. 8. 2011]. Dostupn\u00e9 na internete: http:\/\/www.coskolaneuci.sk<\/p>\n

[4] [online]. http:\/\/portal.statistics.sk\/showdoc.do?docid=1686<\/p>\n

[5] \u0160ulov\u00e1, L. Ran\u00fd v\u00fdvoj a formov\u00e1n\u00ed sexu\u00e1ln\u00ed identity dit\u011bte. In: Bianchi, G. (Ed.). Upgrade pre sexu\u00e1lnu v\u00fdchovu, 2001. Bratislava: VEDA, 2003.<\/p>\n

[6] Lengmeier – Mat\u011bj\u010dek, Z. Psychick\u00e1 deprivace v d\u011btstv\u00ed. Praha: St\u00e1tn\u00ed zdrav. nakladatelstv\u00ed, 1968, s. 141.<\/p>\n

[7] Zhrnutie sociologick\u00fdch \u0161t\u00fadi\u00ed t\u00fdmito akademikmi: W. Bradford Wilcox et al.: Why Marriage Matters: Twenty-Six Conclusions from the Social Sciences (New York: Institute for American Values, 2005). In: \u010co \u0161kola neu\u010d\u00ed. [online]. [citovan\u00e9: 27. 8. 2011]. Dostupn\u00e9 na internete: http:\/\/www.coskolaneuci.sk<\/p>\n

[8] Wilcox et al., Why Marriage Matters, pp. 14, 22, 29, 32, Paul R. Amato, \u201eThe Impact of Family Formation Change on the Cognitive, Social, and Emotional Well-Being of the Next Generation,\u201c The Future of Children 15, no. 2 (Fall 2005), pp. 80-81, Paul R. Amato and Alan Booth, A Generation at Risk: Growing Up in an Era of Family Upheaval (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997), pp. 159, 175, 201-202, Frank F. Furstenberg Jr. \u201ehistory and Current Status of Divorce in the United States,\u201c The Future of Children 4, no. 1 (Spring 1994), p. 37, James H. Bray et al., Longitudinal Changes in Stepfamilies: Impact on Children\u2019s Adjustment (Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association, August 1992). In: \u010co \u0161kola neu\u010d\u00ed. [online]. [citovan\u00e9: 27. 8. 2011]. Dostupn\u00e9 na internete: http:\/\/www.coskolaneuci.sk<\/p>\n

[9] Adam Thomas and Isabel V. Sawhill, \u201eFor Love and Money? The Impact of Family Structure on Family Income\u201c, The Future of Children 15, no. 2 (Fall 2005), p. 65; Isabel V. Sawhill, \u201eThe Behavioral Aspects of Poverty,\u201c Public Interest, no. 153 (Fall 2003), p. 86; \u201eEffect of Family Structure on Child Poverty and Income Inequality\u201c, The Urban Institute Policy and Research Report (Summer-Fall 1996) reporting on Robert I. Lerman, \u201eThe Impact of Changing U.S. Family Structure on Child Poverty and Income Inequality,\u201c Economica 63, no. 250 (1996), pp. S119-139; Norval D. Glenn, University of Texas, Letter to the Editor, New York Times, nov. 11, 1997. In: \u010co \u0161kola neu\u010d\u00ed. [online]. [citovan\u00e9: 27. 8. 2011]. Dostupn\u00e9 na internete: http:\/\/www.coskolaneuci.sk<\/p>\n

[10] Robert I. Lerman, \u201eMarried and Unmarried Parenthood and Economic Well-Being: A Dynamic Analysis of a Recent Cohort,\u201c Urban Institute Report, Washington, D.C., 2002, Lerman, \u201eImpacts of Marital Status and Parental Presence on the Material Hardship of Families with Children,\u201c Urban Institute Report, Washington, D.C., 2002. In: \u010co \u0161kola neu\u010d\u00ed. [online]. [citovan\u00e9: 27. 8. 2011]. Dostupn\u00e9 na internete: http:\/\/www.coskolaneuci.sk<\/p>\n

[11] Bakal\u00e1\u0159, E. Pr\u016fvodce otcovstv\u00edm aneb bez otce se ned\u00e1 dob\u0159e \u017e\u00edt. Praha: Vy\u0161ehrad, 2002, s. 140 \u2013 141 a 146.<\/p>\n

[12] \u010co \u0161kola neu\u010d\u00ed. [online]. [citovan\u00e9: 27. 8. 2011]. Dostupn\u00e9 na internete: http:\/\/www.coskolaneuci.sk<\/p>\n

[13] West, Ch. Radostn\u00e1 zves\u0165 o sexe a man\u017eelstve. Bratislava: Redemptoristi – Slovo medzi nami, 2007, 216 s., ISBN 978 – 80 – 969600 – 9 – 5, s. 47.<\/p>\n

[14] West, Ch. Radostn\u00e1 zves\u0165 o sexe a man\u017eelstve. Bratislava: Redemptoristi – Slovo medzi nami, 2007, 216 s., ISBN 978 – 80 – 969600 – 9 – 5, s. 47 – 48.<\/p>\n

[15] West, Ch. Radostn\u00e1 zves\u0165 o sexe a man\u017eelstve. Bratislava: Redemptoristi – Slovo medzi nami, 2007, 216 s., ISBN 978 – 80 – 969600 – 9 – 5, s. 59.<\/p>\n

[16] Katechizmus Katol\u00edckej cirkvi. Trnava: Spolok sv\u00e4t\u00e9ho Vojtecha, 2002, 918 s., ISBN 80-7162-370-9, s. 575.<\/p>\n

[17] West, Ch. Radostn\u00e1 zves\u0165 o sexe a man\u017eelstve. Bratislava: Redemptoristi – Slovo medzi nami, 2007, 216 s., ISBN 978 – 80 – 969600 – 9 – 5, s. 57.<\/p>\n

[18] P\u0161eni\u010dka, O. Trblietanie dotyku. Pre\u0161ov: Vydavate\u013estvo Michala Va\u0161ka, 1999, 348 s., ISBN 80-88795-14-1, s. 239.<\/p>\n

Foto (v porad\u00ed od hora nadol):
\n Ambro \/ FreeDigitalPhotos.net<\/a> ; Stuart Miles \/ FreeDigitalPhotos.net<\/a> ; photostock \/ FreeDigitalPhotos.net<\/a><\/p>\n

\u010eal\u0161ie \u010dl\u00e1nky<\/h3><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \u010eal\u0161ie in\u0161pirat\u00edvne a pou\u010dn\u00e9 kr\u00e1tke vide\u00e1<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/a>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t Deformovan\u00e1 ml\u00e1de\u017e a jej demoraliz\u00e1cia cez m\u00e9di\u00e1...<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/a>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t Zoznam najbli\u017e\u0161\u00edch akci\u00ed na Vyveska.sk<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/a>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t Kapitola 7 \u2013 Za\u013e\u00fabenos\u0165 nie je l\u00e1ska<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/a>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t Kr\u00e1tky film Amniocent\u00e9za<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/a>\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/div>\n<\/div>